1997 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Ram weights approximately 591 kg more than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Ram (804 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (414 Nm). This means 1997 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Dodge Ram | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Ram | Commander |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 4703 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Torque | 804 Nm | 414 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1677 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2790 mm |
