1997 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Ram weights approximately 718 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1997 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Ram (804 Nm) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 1997 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6. 1997 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Dodge Ram | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | 6 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2486 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 804 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2730 mm |
