1997 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Ram weights approximately 925 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 1997 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Ram (804 Nm) has 616 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 1997 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Dodge Ram | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Ram | CSX |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 804 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1343 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2700 mm |