1997 Eagle Talon vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1997 Eagle Talon is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Eagle Talon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Seat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Eagle Talon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Eagle Talon (289 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 1997 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Eagle Talon | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Eagle | Seat |
| Model | Talon | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Torque | 289 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
