1997 Eagle Vision vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1997 Eagle Vision is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Eagle Vision weights approximately 310 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1975 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1975 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Eagle Vision | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Eagle | Nissan |
| Model | Vision | 240 C |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
