1997 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2010 Ford Transit Connect. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 4 kg more than 1997 Eagle Vision.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Eagle Vision | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2014 mm |