1997 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1997 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1997 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Eagle Vision weights approximately 238 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Eagle Vision | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Eagle | Saturn |
Model | Vision | Outlook |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |