1997 Fiat Panda vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1997 Fiat Panda is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1997 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1997 Fiat Panda.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Fiat Panda. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Fiat Panda | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Panda | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 768 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2430 mm |