1997 Ford Aerostar vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1997 Ford Aerostar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 765 kg more than 1997 Ford Aerostar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Aerostar | 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Aerostar | Corniche |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3030 mm |