1997 Ford Aerostar vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 345 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Aerostar | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Aerostar | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
