1997 Ford Aerostar vs. 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Aerostar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (543 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 1997 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 417 kg more than 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Aerostar | 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Aerostar | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 543 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 637 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |