1997 Ford Aerostar vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 64 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 1997 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Aerostar | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Aerostar | C30 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2639 mm |