1997 Ford F-150 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1997 Ford F-150 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-150 weights approximately 935 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford F-150 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | F-150 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2190 mm |
