1997 Ford F-150 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-150 (217 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1997 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-150 (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1997 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford F-150 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | 3 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2639 mm |