1997 Ford F-150 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-150. (217 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-150.
Because 1997 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-150 (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Megane. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford F-150 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | F-150 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2630 mm |
