1997 Ford F-250 vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (232 HP @ 2700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (677 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Holden UTE. (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford F-250 | 1973 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-250 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 5047 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 677 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1390 mm |
