1997 Ford F-250 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-250 (232 HP @ 2700 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-250 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2004 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (677 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford F-250 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | F-250 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7275 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 2700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 677 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2860 mm |