1997 Ford F-250 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (232 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (677 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (325 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford F-250 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-250 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 677 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2880 mm |
