1997 Ford F-250 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (306 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (575 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE. 1997 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford F-250 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | UTE |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6800 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 575 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |