1997 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (232 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (677 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 1997 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford F-250 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-250 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 677 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
