1997 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Falcon would be higher. Both 1997 Ford Falcon and 2003 Ford Falcon are equipped with a 3,984 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1997 Ford Falcon. (205 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Falcon weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 357 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Falcon | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Falcon |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2800 mm |