1997 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2004 Rover City is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Falcon | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Falcon | City |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |