1997 Ford Husky vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Husky. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Husky would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1997 Ford Husky. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Husky.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 565 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Husky. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Husky.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Husky | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Husky | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 700 Nm |
