1997 Ford Ka vs. 1990 Mazda Eunos
To start off, 1997 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 3,924 cc, 1990 Mazda Eunos is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mazda Eunos weights approximately 720 kg more than 1997 Ford Ka.
Because 1990 Mazda Eunos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mazda Eunos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Mazda Eunos has automatic transmission and 1997 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 1997 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Mazda Eunos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Ka | 1990 Mazda Eunos | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ka | Eunos |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3924 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |
