1997 Ford Ka vs. 1993 Renault Clio

To start off, 1997 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1997 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1997 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Ka 1993 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Ka Clio
Year Released 1997 1993
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 72 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 105 Nm 107 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 75.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 77 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 3 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 900 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1400 mm