1997 Ford Maverick vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Ford Maverick is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Maverick (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1997 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Maverick (221 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Maverick | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Maverick | 66 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |