1997 Ford Maverick vs. 2003 Subaru R2

To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Maverick (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Maverick weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Subaru R2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Maverick (221 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Maverick 2003 Subaru R2
Make Ford Subaru
Model Maverick R2
Year Released 1997 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2663 cc 658 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 63 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1850 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3400 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1530 mm