1997 Ford Maverick vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1997 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Maverick weights approximately 344 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Maverick. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Maverick.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Maverick 2004 Mazda Tribute
Make Ford Mazda
Model Maverick Tribute
Year Released 1997 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2663 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 123 HP 201 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 266 Nm
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1850 kg 1506 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1780 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]