1997 Ford Maverick vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1997 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Maverick.
Because 1997 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Maverick (221 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Maverick | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Maverick | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1306 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1350 mm |
