1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 507 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Mustang | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Mustang | Elite |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 590 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |
