1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Trabant P 601
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant P 601. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant P 601 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 321 kg more than 1964 Trabant P 601.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 625 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Trabant P 601. (53 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Trabant P 601.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1964 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Ford | Trabant |
Model | Mustang | P 601 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 53 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2030 mm |