1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1997 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1997 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Mustang | 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mustang | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 590 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |
