1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Volvo 145
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 488 more horse power than 1973 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1973 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Volvo 145 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volvo 145. (152 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1973 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 145 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 590 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 728 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |