1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Seat 133
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Seat 133 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 556 more horse power than 1976 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 240 kg more than 1976 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 674 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 133. (54 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1976 Seat 133 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 133 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 590 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 728 Nm | 54 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2030 mm |