1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Volvo 260
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 260 weights approximately 414 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 260. (218 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1979 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 260 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |