1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Mustang | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Mustang | Etna |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 331 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |
