1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Acura Integra would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 1991 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Mustang | Integra |
Year Released | 1997 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |