1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Holden Nova
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP) has 509 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Holden Nova weights approximately 85 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Mustang | 1994 Holden Nova | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Mustang | Nova |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 590 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 728 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
