1997 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 3,795 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 130 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Mustang | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3795 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |
