1997 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Omega weights approximately 729 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Omega. 2003 Opel Omega has automatic transmission and 1997 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1997 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Opel Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 2003 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Mustang | Omega |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |