1997 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Mustang | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | UTE |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |