1997 Ford Probe vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Probe would be higher. Both 1997 Ford Probe and 2010 Holden Epica are equipped with a 1,991 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1997 Ford Probe. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Probe.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Probe. (172 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Probe.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Probe | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Probe | Epica |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |