1997 Ford Puma vs. 1951 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1951 Nissan Sedan. (14 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1951 Nissan Sedan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 1951 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Puma | Sedan |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1951 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 720 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
