1997 Ford Puma vs. 1958 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,680 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 50 kg more than 1958 Opel Rekord.
Because 1958 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1958 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Rekord |
Year Released | 1997 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1680 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |