1997 Ford Puma vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 400 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | Puma | 4 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
