1997 Ford Puma vs. 1970 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 130 kg more than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1970 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Puma | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1997 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |