1997 Ford Puma vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Puma | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
