1997 Ford Puma vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 190 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Ford Puma | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Puma | 66 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
