1997 Ford Puma vs. 1982 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,689 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Rekord weights approximately 40 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Because 1982 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Ford Puma | 1982 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Rekord |
Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |