1997 Ford Puma vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,437 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Puma weights approximately 90 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Puma (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Ford Puma 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Puma Colt
Year Released 1997 1984
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1388 cc 1437 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 126 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1010 kg 920 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2390 mm